FYI, I went over these same issues in a blog post (about a year ago now).

Your argument is weak unless you advocate also denying marriage to heterosexual couples who either have no intention of making babies, or are incapable of making them. Further, you'd also have to go along with the anullment of any existing marriages between men & women that have not produced offspring. Heck, if procreation is all people are good for, I'm sure you're in favor of requiring all heterosexuals get married and make babies or else.

I'm not sure how any of it justifies Ms Prejean's hypocrisy and violation of her contract, though.

As for loading humanity on a spaceship, others before you have advocated something like that, but came to a bad end because of it (here's an explanation of what I mean). I certainly do not wish the same for you, even if I disagree with you.

Sounds like non-diety judgenent to me

G_d put men and women on the earth to go forth, reproduce and multiply; the most basic building block of life for all life, especially here on Earth

.

No life, no matter how politically incorrect, will ever spring forth from the "true" love and sex – not reproductive behavior – between same sex human partners.

For those whom seek to bash me for my personal views – I accepted my homosexual friends, family members and their views long before (50 years) your parents beget your life as a result.

For those whom aspire to wealth, intellect and popularity; the simplest bird, and the poorest human being, have a better chance at an after life than your professed self-interest.

Yet still, these words still do not denounce your views.

The Earth is dying, and mankind must load a spaceship to carry on our species.

Whom do we choose to carry on life.

Those whom cannot procreate, or those that can.

This is the tween view between sex, and reproductive behavior.

It is all good sex; it is NOT all reproductive behavior/