CT state capitol tower & domeUpdate: There’s a little news about the Connecticut budget; please see below. And now, on with my original post:

Pardon me, Dear Reader, for another departure from the usual topics of this blog. This is something that desperately needs to be addressed … and since it involves immaturity and irrationality, it’s tangentially relevant to things I usually cover here. So here goes.

Oh, and forgive the length of this post. A lot needs to be said about this — for better or worse. OK, on to it, then!

For those of you not familiar with my home state of Connecticut, the government here is in dire fiscal straits. We face a massive budget deficit, which our government has not yet resolved (cached). Our fiscal year began this July 1, but as yet we have no budget. Our legislature convened this past January, knowing it had just under 6 months to get a budget together, but somehow it never happened. The legislature and governor’s office squandered that time, and did absofuckinglutely nothing whatsoever.

Of course, Connecticut’s government is still running, metaphorically on fumes via executive orders that continue many programs but have halted others. Since then, all that’s happened is a lot of kvetching, bellyaching, hand-wringing, and whining. A series of budget proposals were offered … by the governor, by Democrats in the legislature, and by Republicans. Some of those were revised over the past few months, but nearly all went nowhere. A lot of the inactivity was because the legislature bided its time, waiting until state employees could ratify a “giveback” package which (cached), unfortunately, still left a gaping hole to be filled (cached). With that deal in place — and because of it, lacking any ability to lay off state workers to save money — progress on a budget ground to a halt once again, with the usual sniveling and sniping between parties.

The only meaningful action took place last week, when Connecticut’s legislature, with a dramatic vote in the evenly-divided state Senate (36 seats are split 18-18 between the parties) approved the Republicans’ most recent budget, which has too many cuts (cached) to suit Democratic governor Dannel Malloy‘s fancy, and he’s said he’ll veto it.

Beyond some more sniping, nothing is happening. There are no budget talks. There’s nothing on the horizon, no progress to report. It’s expected Connecticut will begin October without a budget.

The problem is, even if Malloy signed the GOP budget, it would give the Nutmeg State a budget for the next two years … but it wouldn’t solve the state’s deficit problem (cached). It’d just put off the matter of the budget deficit until 2019’s legislative session, when this whole laughable exercise would start all over again.

There’s an underlying problem with state government finances, which neither party is willing to address — and in fact, they’ve worked hard not to address it, for decades now. That underlying problem is Connecticut’s massive liabilities … mainly in the form of pensions and retiree benefits (cached). Put simply, the state failed to fund pensions adequately (for decades), and retirement payments have blossomed over the last several years. Keep in mind that the state pays pensions not only for retired state employees, but also for public school teachers (hired at the municipal level, and by number of regional districts). As “baby boomers” retire, this will only get even worse than it already is — and it’s already sapping the state’s coffers.

The two parties offer the usual two solutions one would expect: Democrats want taxes increased, especially on the wealthy, to confiscatory rates; and Republicans want taxes cut, because supposedly this will cause an economic boom that in turn will increase revenues. Let me be honest: Neither of these is going to work. Tax cuts of the GOP style fail, as the state of Kansas found out — and as that state’s Republicans, who rule there, were recently forced to concede (cached). The Democrats’ scenario — raising rates on millionaires — isn’t much better. It’s not that they can’t afford it, or that they’ll leave the state if their taxes are raised (which is a common GOP contention); it’s that most of Connecticut’s highest earners run hedge funds, which are volatile, and it’s impossible to anticipate what they’ll be paying in, any given year (or quarter, for that matter). At times, they’ve accounted for up to 30% of state revenues (cached). That’s a big chunk of the state’s coffers to have to leave up to such an iffy income stream. Increasing the sales tax rate, or eliminating sales tax exemptions (say, on prescription drugs) would provide a more even, and thus anticipatable, revenue increase, but sales taxes are inherently regressive (cached) and furthermore, as they go up, the return diminishes. Adding (say) 50 basis points on a 7% sales tax generates less added revenue than adding those same 50 basis points on a 5% sales tax.

The only real solution is to cut the liabilities and (somehow) reduce retirement benefit payments. Ostensibly this was supposed to have happened with the “concessions deal” that was worked out in July. However, this deal is a mixed bag, because while it does save some money, it keeps state government employment where it is, which in the long run will tend to keep liabilities high. So it doesn’t really help much. The state’s GOP has said this since it was first negotiated, and although I disagree with them on many things, on this point, they’re correct.

The state’s other major expense — aside from employee wages and benefits — is Medicaid. While it gets some federal matching funds, this too is a major drain on state coffers. The problem is, there isn’t much left to cut here. Medicaid reimbursements have been pared down, little by little, with each budget that’s been passed since the early ’90s. There’s been a contraction in the number of nursing homes, with many of them folding, but the state’s elderly population is not dropping. It’s not that there isn’t any more that might be shaved off … the practice of having Medicaid patients taken to appointments by ambulance, rather than taxi or some other much-cheaper alternative, certainly needs to be changed and can save money. But there’s just not a lot left to be had.

What Connecticut needs are structural changes to its finances, both spending and taxation, as well as the reining in of long-term liabilities and debt. It needs more reliable revenue streams, and spending cuts, including paring down the state’s employment rolls, along with reducing pension payments. An easy start would be an immediate end to the practice of “double-dipping” such as in this case (cached) And that’s but one example … lots of these guys are getting two paychecks from the state. A state employee should either get a payroll check, or a pension check, but never both. The practice of letting them use spikes in overtime ratchet up their pension checks, also needs to end (cached). These are two reforms which would not only save money every year in payroll, but they’d save more than that in pensions, in the long haul. Thinning out the ranks of state employees would also have a similar cascading effect, saving some money in the short term and even more in the future.

Good luck getting that to happen, though. The legislature’s leadership (namely, the Democrats who’re the majority in the House of Representatives) are closely hooked in with the state’s public employee unions. In fact, in his “day job,” House Speaker Joe Aresimowicz is a representative for one of those unions (specifically, AFSCME). Like his federal counterpart, Aresimowicz drives all legislation in his chamber. That practically screams “conflict of interest,” but no one in Hartford has noticed.

There’s yet another consideration: State aid to cities and towns (while Connecticut has counties, they exist only geographically, there are no county governments). This money typically goes toward funding public education, due to a provision in the state constitution (specifically, section 4 of article VIII). There are also PILOT payments (payments in lieu of taxes) which compensate towns and cities for untaxed property (e.g. for buildings owned by the state or non-profits). Over the last 15-20 years these payments have grown, as the cost of education has gone up. Among the bigger elements of that increasing cost are special education budgets, which in many towns and districts have literally exploded.

The governor has pushed to get school districts to begin contributing to teacher pensions (they’ve never had to before), and both parties’ budgets reduce payments to cities and towns. While this helps state finances, unless costs at the municipal level are lowered, all it will do is cause local property taxes to go up — which won’t help Nutmeggers at all. Ultimately, that sort of cost-shifting is also not a viable long-term solution. What needs to happen is that the cost of running municipalities — and for nearly all of them, that’s education — needs to be reduced significantly.

There has been talk of allowing municipalities to impose an extra sales tax of 1% on restaurant bills, which could ease the property tax burden, but … really? Why just restaurants? Why not on everything that has a sales tax? And what about very-small towns that have few or no restaurants? That this provision makes little sense probably explains why it hasn’t been mentioned over the last few weeks. Still, giving towns and cities an added revenue stream, is probably not a bad idea. Not that I’m a fan of new taxes, but property taxes are problematic.

The long and short of it is: Connecticut needs to restructure its government finances. It absolutely needs to happen at the state level, and ought to happen at the municipal level; and it needs to begin now. Not in a few months, or a few weeks — but now! The city of Hartford is at the edge of bankruptcy, and will soon be forced to make changes (cached) — either on its own, or by state or bankruptcy-court order), but really the whole state needs a drastic governmental-financial makeover.

But … knowing this … what are our leaders in Hartford doing? Nothing. Not. One. Single. Fucking. Thing. No budget negotiations are taking place. Not even the individual parties are discussing their next proposals. Nothing is happening — at all. This is an absolute, fucking shame. Everyone in the state Capitol; the governor, both houses of the legislature, and both political parties, appear to have collectively given up.

It’s time for them to get off their whiney little asses and start doing their jobs. Really, they ought to have done their jobs months ago and generated a new, workable budget prior to this past July 1. They ought to be ashamed of themselves for not having met that deadline. But they should be doubly ashamed for having thrown up their hands, now. It’s time for them to get back to fucking work already and do their fucking jobs, fercryinoutloud.

P.S. I will end this by explaining, especially to those of you who aren’t from Connecticut, that the Nutmeg State’s fiscal disaster is not of partisan origin. It wasn’t caused only by one party or the other. Yes, it’s dominated right now by Democrats, having had a Democratic legislature for what seems like ages, and a Democratic governor since January 2011; but we had Republican governors since 1995 (John Rowland, who was convicted of corruption in 2004, then succeeded by his lieutenant governor Jodi Rell, who was elected in her own right in 2006) and prior to that, an ostensible independent (Lowell Weicker) beginning in 1991. Both parties played a part in consistently and repeatedly putting off funding pension and benefit liabilities, and that tendency goes back decades. Thus, elected officials from both parties are responsible for it. That’s both of them. Don’t let anyone convince you this is solely the fault of only one party … because it’s not. By contrast, the fiscal crisis in Kansas is largely the fault of that state’s GOP (cached), and in particular governor Sam Brownback.

Update: It took a couple weeks but Connecticut’s leaders finally decided to try working out a budget. That this is what they should have been doing, back in May and June, doesn’t seem to have occurred to them.

Oh, and despite of all of this, the state’s main teachers’ union is suing the governor to get school funding restored (cached). It doesn’t matter to them that the state’s finances are in the toilet; they just want their fucking money! “Show me the money,” they’re saying. “Show me the money!” I have no idea which stone they plan to bleed in order to get the money they demand, but they’re going to demand it, anyway. I guess.

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on The Nutmeg State is Screwed, But No One in Hartford Cares

Vintage RCA International 7 Transistor Radio, Model AH-271-S, Holiday Series Radio, 2 Bands, Made In Japan / Joe Haput, via FlickrFormer judge Roy Moore, perhaps the best-known Christofascist in Alabama, is an agnostic blogger’s dream. The man literally cannot stop shooting his mouth off like the militant Christianist he is, and he repeatedly demonstrates everything that’s wrong with religionism — and by extension, religion. He’s running for US Senate, and in a primary runoff for the GOP nomination, which gives him every incentive to spew the most ridiculous Christofascist tripe imaginable. As the Friendly Atheist explains, during last night’s debate, he didn’t disappoint (Archive.Is cached article):

As a graduate of the United States Military Academy at West Point and a Vietnam veteran, I want to work our military strong again. I want it freed from political correctness and social experimentation, like transistor troops in our bathrooms and inclusiveness.

Now, if anyone can explain to me what a “transistor troop” is, I’d love to know … because I haven’t the first fucking clue what that is. Best I can figure is, it’s a vaguely-sinister-sounding expression that Moore conjured up. As the Friendly Atheist put it, he tossed that in along with a reference to bathrooms (which the Religious Right has pitched fits over for more than a year) to create a little R.R. “word salad” that will appeal to Alabama’s Christianists (and there are many).

What makes Moore such a marvelous example of what’s wrong with religion, is that he upends the common trope of militant Christianists like him being merely “the lunatic fringe” and not representative of the wider Christian population. He’s a Decalogue champion who was removed from office as Chief Justice of Alabama’s Supreme Court back in 2003 after defying a federal court’s order to remove a Ten Commandments monument (cached). Despite the shame of that, however, the good Christianist folk of Alabama re-elected him to that office in 2012 (cached). That he won a statewide race for an office he’d been thrown out of over his dour Christofascism nearly a decade earlier, tells me he absolutely is not just a “fringe” crank, and that his Christianism definitely is representative of — and approved by — the majority of Alabamans. It’s undeniable!

Of course, Moore proved too extreme a Christianist to stay in his new office (a second time) for long, and was suspended for yet more Jesus-inspired judicial misconduct, then formally resigned in order to run for Senate (cached). If the people of Alabama elect him to the US Senate — which appears very possible — they’ll have proven themselves dour Christofascists twice over. Which will mean it’ll be even harder for them to disown him than it already is.

Photo credit: Joe Haupt, via Flickr.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 1 Comment »

The End is Not NearI’ve already blogged a couple of times about Christian crank David Meade, who claims a “Biblical prophecy” (bolstered by numerology, pseudoastronomy, solar eclipses, the Egyptian pyramids, Bible codes, and conspiratorialism) predicts “the End of the World” will start this coming Saturday, September 23, 2017. Initially these stories were found only in Rupert Murdoch’s outlets, but many others have picked up this story. Some relay it as breathlessly as Murdoch’s papers, channels, and sites, but others treat it more dismissively (recognizing it as the bullshit it is).

One outlet that dismisses it is Christianity Today, which protested this kind of crap (Archive.Is cached article):

Again, we must deal with fake news. I’ve written on this numerous times before here and here and, undoubtedly, this won’t be the last time.

In this case, it’s making Christians look silly.

Again.

But there it is on the front page of Fox News, “Christian doomsdayers claim world will end next week.”

It’s under the heading “Science.” When you click on it, the article headline proclaims, “Biblical prophecy claims the world will end on Sept. 23, Christian numerologists claim.”

Note, first of all, that CT‘s chief objection to this “Biblical prophecy” is not that it’s all bullshit, predicated on distortions and lies. Oh no. Their initial objection is “it’s making Christians look silly.” Well, duh. Of course it is! It’s making Christians look silly, because this sort of bullshit is entirely consistent with Christianity’s long history of trotting out “prophecies” which are dire scenarios of death and destruction. Arguably, Christianity itself was clearly inspired by 1st century CE apocalyptic Judaism … so the propounding of apocalyptic doom is entirely within its wheelhouse! If Christians don’t want to look silly, they need to alter their religion so it doesn’t lead to this kind of doomsaying, and they need to shut down — and shut up — anyone in their religion who does so.

Yeah I know, good luck with that. Clearly Christians have no desire to do this … hence, if those crankish doomsayers make them look bad, they have no one to blame but themselves for allowing those doomsayers to run amok for the last two millennia.

But on top of that “boo hoo hoo, this crank makes us look bad” whine, CT goes on to explain:

No, the world won’t end on September 23rd and, Fox News, believe it or not, there is no such thing as a ‘Christian numerologist.’

Note the claim at the end of this sentence: “There is no such thing as a ‘Christian numerologist.’” That, unfortunately for CT, is simply not true. There absolutely are “Christian numerologists” because numerology is embedded within the religion.

Consider the significance of certain numbers, in Christian scripture: The numbers 3, 7, and 12 (for example) figure in repeatedly. Adam and Eve had 3 sons, and so did Noah; Jesus was accompanied by 3 apostles in the Transfiguration; Peter denied him 3 times; Jesus was dead 3 days; the world was created in 7 days; the book of Revelation begins with 7 letters to 7 churches of Asia; later in it, there are 7 seals and 7 trumpets; Jacob/Israel had 12 sons who founded 12 tribes; Jesus had 12 apostles; 144,000 (or 12×12) “sons of Israel” appear in Revelation; and on and on it goes. Numbers clearly matter in the Bible. They have metaphorical and metaphysical meaning, on many levels. This inevitably leads to numerological analysis.

What’s more, there’s actually explicit numerology in scripture. Specifically, it’s found in Revelation:

Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six. (Revelation 13:18)

But some early manuscripts say “the number of the Beast” is 616, not 666 (fortunately, some modern Bible translations indicate this). This is hard to make sense of, if one assumes (as many Christians do) that Revelation’s Beast is some future person; but if one is looking for historical figures whom the author of Revelation knew about (it was probably composed in the 90s CE), there’s one obvious candidate that could explain this coincidence. That infamous person’s name, in Greek, when transliterated into Hebrew and rendered using Hebrew gematria, is 666, but his Latin name (also transliterated into Hebrew) becomes 616. That infamous person is none other than the Roman emperor Nero. Nero was said to have persecuted Christians (both Christian and non-Christian authors report it). He is also said to have martyred the apostle Peter. He was, to put it briefly, a common bogeyman among Christians (not wholly unreasonably, it seems). So it makes sense for him to have inspired the figure of “the Beast.”

At any rate, to say there’s no such thing as a Christian numerologist is to assert there was no special use of numbers within Christian tradition, and especially in the Bible — which on its face is foolish. All by itself, “the number of the Beast” is numerology. Period.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on Christians Try to Evade 9/23/2017 “Biblical Prophecy”

'NASA warns disaster is near as Nibiru heads for Earth' / satire site News4KTLA, via SnopesI just blogged about Christian “prophet” David Meade, who claims “the End of the World” was predicted to happen — by the Bible, the Egyptian pyramids, and a wicked conspiracy, woven together with numerology and assorted screwy pseudoastronomical notions — just under a week from now (on September 23, 2017, to be exact).

Since posting that, I’ve seen stories trumpeting Meade’s asinine and laughable “discovery” that add an additional point to his insane scenario; namely, that he’s supposedly seen actual photos of this “Planet X” (aka Nibiru). The (UK) Sunday Express, for example, reports on this amazing claim (Archive.Is cached article):

Christian conspiracy theorist David Meade, who claims the alleged giant planet Nibiru – which is officially unknown to astronomical science – will pass the Earth causing a global apocalypse in October, says he has been shown secret footage which proves it exists.

Speaking on Late Night in the Midlands, a US conspiracy theory radio show, Mr Meade said: “The sightings are increasing in my opinion.”

He claimed he had spoken to a professor of astronomy in Paris based at a large observatory, who told him Nibiru was real.…

“I’ve seen it and he told me the name of the observatory he has seen it at, and he said he had a secret film of it, which he later sent me.

“He had taken it with his phone and it is an actual photo of the system, he got out of the observatory at a very high level, and he has shared it with me since.

“I have not shared it with the public, but I have seen it.”

He said a fellow conspiracy theorist had also shared a new snap with him.

Mr Meade added: “A colleague of mine recently sent me photo which makes it appear Planet X is currently right over the North Pole.

Meade’s breathless assertion is truly fucking hilarious, and fully in line with how conspiratorialists work. He assures us the photos are “real,” and we can be assured of that, because:

  1. He has seen them (although he won’t release them)
  2. They came from a real, working astronomer (whose name and credentials he won’t disclose)
  3. That astronomer works at a real, working observatory (whose name he likewise won’t disclose)
  4. The existence of these photos was backed up by another conspiratorialist (whom Meade won’t name)

All of this is a steaming load, heaved right out the back of the barn. I will say this outright: Meade is lying. He hasn’t seen the photos he said he saw, and they don’t exist. He made it all up in a desperate effort to bolster his fucking ridiculous scenario and sell more books before his “Biblical prophecy” proves false, this coming Saturday.

I’ll conclude this post by repeating what I’ve said for many years now: “Biblical prophecy” is bullshit. Fraudulent. Lies. All of it, all the time, everywhere, every time, without exception. There is, simply put, no such thing as a valid “Biblical prophecy.” It. Does. Not. Exist. Period.

Photo credit: Satire site News4KTLA, via Snopes.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 2 Comments »

Sumerian seal / via Doug's DarkworldIf you pay any attention to Rupert Murdoch-owned media outlets, then by now you’ve come across a report or two about how the world is going to end this September 23. Perhaps the most alarming and expansive of those reports comes from the (UK) Sun, but similar stories are on most of Murdoch’s sites (Archive.Is cached article):

DOOMSDAY could be sooner than you think if you are to believe conspiracy theorists claiming a planet will collide with Earth on September 23, 2017.

Bible passages apparently supporting a centuries’ old prediction of the end of the world have intrigued many around the world – but what’s it all about?

A Christian numerologist claims a verse in the Bible proves that the world will end on September 23.

In Luke’s passage 21: 25 to 26, there is a quote which apparently matches the date of the Great American Solar Eclipse, when Hurricane Harvey hit and when Texas was flooded.

September 23 was pinpointed using codes from the Bible and also a “date marker” shown by the pyramids of Giza in Egypt.

This alarming report goes on … and on and on and on … from there. This is just idiotic, maddening bullshit.

Christian “prophet” David Meade’s scenario checks off all the requisite points of pseudoastronomy, pseuodohistory, and “End Times” caterwauling. It has Bible verses, Nibiru aka Planet X, numerology, solar eclipses, the Egyptian pyramids, and Bible codes, among many other features. It’s as though Meade used the shotgun approach, trying to weave every crackpot feature he could think of, into his “prophecy.”

But none of that matters, because as I said, it’s all bullshit. First, there is no Nibiru or Planet X. It was cooked up by the late crackpot pseudohistorian Zechariah Sitchin, of The Twelfth Planet fame. Sitchin’s scenario is a brazen lie.

Second, numerology is bullshit, plain and simple. There’s nothing behind it — period. Nor is there any veracity in any “Bible codes.”

Third, there’s nothing magical or supernatural about the Egyptian pyramids. And yes, in fact we do know how the pyramids were built … and humans did it, not gods or extraterrestrials. There’s also nothing magical or supernatural about eclipses. We know how they happen … and again, neither gods nor aliens have anything to do with them.

But lastly, what really makes this “Bible prophecy” bullshit, is that it’s “Bible prophecy”! As I covered in my static page on the subject, all Biblical prophecies are rotten, stinking lies. Every last one of them: All the time, every time, by definition and with no exceptions.

Sure, believers can produce all kinds of scriptural passages that they say predict the future. Most of these are interpretations, usually extracted via convoluted analysis, and employing lots of cherry-picking. The real problem with it all, as I explain, is that the Bible simply can’t be used this way. As it turns out, it contains at least one specific, explicit prediction of the future, which absolutely failed to come true, and is recorded in all three synoptic gospels (emphasis mine):

“Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom.” (Mt 16:28)

And Jesus was saying to them, “Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the kingdom of God after it has come with power.” (Mk 9:1)

“But I say to you truthfully, there are some of those standing here who will not taste death until they see the kingdom of God.” (Lk 9:27)

Almost two millennia have passed since Jesus supposedly said that, and all those people to whom he said it have been dead almost as long; yet “the kingdom of God” has not come (“with power” or without). Jesus’ prediction literally cannot ever possibly come true.

If an explicit prediction — which doesn’t require any analysis or interpretation — has failed so obviously, then how can the rest of the Bible be viewed as a credible source of “prophecy”?It just doesn’t work. Period. End of discussion.

Note: This the first of two posts about this “prophecy.” The crank who cooked it up is still desperately trying to sell his book before it’s proven false by his “prophecy’s” impending failure. So if you want more laughs, read on!

Photo credit: Doug’s Darkworld.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on No, the World Won’t End on September 23, 2017

Vatican flag (8583012024)The Roman Catholic Church obviously has a major problem. It’s been decades in the making, and has been on the front burner of occidental society for going on 20 years now. But it doesn’t seem to go away … because Church personnel just won’t stop doing shit they know they’re not supposed to do.

The latest case doesn’t involve abuse of children by a priest … but it’s close. As the New York Times reports, the Vatican has recalled one of their diplomats from their Washington Embassy due to kiddie porn (Archive.Is cached article):

The Vatican has recalled a high-ranking priest working as a diplomat in the Holy See’s embassy in Washington after American authorities sought to strip his immunity and potentially charge him with possession of child pornography, the Vatican said Friday.

In a statement, the Vatican said that it had been notified by the State Department on Aug. 21 of “a possible violation of laws relating to child pornography images” by a member of its diplomatic corps.

The Vatican said the priest would face an investigation and potential trial in Vatican City. But some critics saw in the Vatican’s move a reflexive step to protect its own by whisking a priest away from a justice system in a foreign land.

The statement did not identify the cleric, but Italian news media reports and an American official familiar with the investigation said it was Msgr. Carlo Alberto Capella, who was ordained in Milan in 1993 and entered the diplomatic corps in 2004. He has also worked as a diplomat in Hong Kong and as the Holy See’s liaison to Italy.

The article suggests this is standard practice for diplomats accused of crimes, but let’s be honest here: It fully coincides with the well-worn, and well-known, Church policy of vacuuming up clergy accused of wrongdoing and shuffling them off someplace else. The Times relates a story of another Vatican diplomat — an archbishop, Jozef Wesolowski, nuncio to the Dominican Republic — who was similarly brought back to Vatican City and was supposed to have been “tried” for his crimes, only to die (conveniently) before that trial. I expect something similar to happen in this case; it will languish in the bowels of the Vatican Curia long enough for the just-recalled diplomat to die or to become so old or infirm that he ends up never being tried. Guaranteed.

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on Vatican Diplomat Caught in Kiddie Porn Case

‘Terrorism is still terrorism … even if your God does it!’ / PsiCop original graphicGiven the wave of similar stories I’ve blogged about the last couple weeks, I just created a static page dedicated to the topic I call “disaster theology” (and the closely-related “massacre theology”). This is when some sanctimoniously-outraged religionist declares that some catastrophe was caused — or permitted to happen — by their all-powerful deity, who’s pissed off about something.

In the US, this is a common refrain among Christianists and the Religious Right. Just recently, for example, they told us that Hurricanes Harvey and Irma were caused by the expansion of gay rights in the US. Previously, all sorts of terrible events — the earthquake in Haiti, massacres in Newtown, CT and in Aurora, CO, and much more — have been attributed to God being outraged over something.

The unstated assumption behind all this, as I’ve remarked, is that the Almighty inflicts destruction and death wantonly on people (the innocent and guilty alike) in order to get them to do what s/he/it wants (or, perhaps more importantly, whatever the religionist promoting this notion wants). In other words, it assumes God is an almighty cosmic terrorist … no different, really, from all sorts of other terrorists we’ve heard about over the last couple decades.

I find it difficult to believe that any rational person would want to venerate and worship a being they obviously believe to be this horrific and malevolent. It defies reason to wish to do so. Only irrational people could actually support such a being — angry, nasty people who have no morals to speak of. It’s disturbing to live in a country where this sort of malevolent-deity worshipper is this common. In fact, it’s downright scary.

P.S. Given what his/her/its followers commonly believe about him/her/it, it’s not really all that difficult to conclude that the Abrahamic God is actually a malevolent being.

Photo credit: PsiCop original graphic.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on New Page: What’s Wrong With Disaster Theology?