Posts Tagged “religionist”

Rainbow flag - DC Capital Pride parade - 2013-06-08 (8992857356)This is the fifth in a series of posts I plan about the recent Orlando gay-nightclub shooting, by an American Muslim who appears to have been influenced by ISIS and other violent Islamists. By now my readers will surely know a great deal about this horrific event. The topic of this post is:

Militant Christianists Spout Off Like the Hateful Cretins They Are

We all know by now that America’s Christianists are hateful little monsters who simply cannot — and will not — tolerate anything they dislike. They constantly rage and bluster and fume about all sorts of people they think shouldn’t be allowed to exist. A lot of the time they’re able to hide their despicable hatred, but all too often, something triggers them, their sanctimonious fury takes over, and they show their true colors. Talking Points Memo reported on a couple of them doing just that (WebCite cached article):

After 49 people were gunned down in an Orlando gay nightclub in the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. history, pastors in California and Arizona praised the gunman for massacring “perverted predators” and “pedophiles.”

In Sacramento, Pastor Roger Jimenez of Verity Baptist Church said the killer succeeded in making Orlando safer.

“Are you sad that 50 pedophiles were killed today?” Jimenez said in a sermon originally posted on YouTube. “Um no, I think that’s great! I think that helps society. I think Orlando, Florida is a little safer tonight.”

In the sermon, delivered just hours after the rampage on Sunday morning, Jimenez also said, “I wish the government would round them all up, put them up against a wall, put a firing squad in front of them and blow their brains out.”

Tempe, Arizona preacher Steven Anderson also rushed to praise the “good news” that “there are 50 less pedophiles in this world.”

In a video posted online, Anderson, a pastor at Faithful Word Baptist Church, said while he wouldn’t advocate for violence, he said LGBT people should be “executed by a righteous government.”

“The bad news is that a lot of the homos in the bar are still alive, so they’re going to continue to molest children and recruit children into their filthy homosexual lifestyle,” he said, adding the attack would be used to attack Christians and push gun control.

“I’m not sad about it, I’m not gonna cry about it because these 50 people in the gay bar that got shot up were going to die of AIDS and syphilis and whatever else,” he continued. “At least these dangerous, filthy predators are off the streets. I’m just trying to look on the bright side.”

The videos were taken down by Youtube, but Anderson’s has been preserved:

Please note, Jimenez has since doubled down on his remarks and is unrepentant about his hatred for gays (cached).

In addition to these two creatures, longtime Christofascist prick Marion “Pat” Robertson, as Right Wing Watch reports, spewed yet more of his asinine ridiculousness (cached):

Today on “The 700 Club,” televangelist Pat Robertson reacted to the massacre at an Orlando gay club by making the absurd claim that liberal LGBT rights advocates have aligned themselves with radical Islamists and are now reaping what they have sowed.

Robertson said that liberals are facing a “dilemma” because they love both LGBT equality and Islamic extremism, and that it is better for conservatives like himself not to get involved but to instead just watch the two groups kill each other.

“The left is having a dilemma of major proportions and I think for those of us who disagree with some of their policies, the best thing to do is to sit on the sidelines and let them kill themselves,” he said.

Robertson, like Newt Gingrich, incorrectly presumes the American Left is “allied” with, or even includes, militant Islamists. In reality, a lot of Islamists effectively lean in the direction of fascism, and have nothing in common with American Leftists. Moreover, the Left is a secular movement, and Islamists despise secularism above most other things. So they can hardly be viewed as having any connection.

What bothers Robertson is, in all likelihood, Leftists’ determined avoidance of saying or doing anything that might even remotely be viewed as denigrating to Islam or to Muslims. Although this policy is misguided — it purposely ignores the fact that some terrorism, such as the Orlando massacre, is in fact driven by Islam (cached), in the minds of those who carry out these atrocities — that doesn’t mean Islamists are allied with, or part of, the American Left. Far from it! All it means is that they’ve successfully intimidated the Left. Which really, isn’t much of an achievement, since they intimidate pretty much everyone.

Now, with all of this said, it’s easy for moderate and reasonable Christians out there to point out that we’re talking about just 3 people here (Jimenez, Anderson, & Robertson), and they hardly reflect on Christianity as a whole. But let’s be honest: Those moderate Christians will do absolutely nothing about any of them. Each will retain his ministry, or in the case of Robertson, his broadcasting network. None of them will be ousted from their positions, or in any other way punished or disciplined because of what they said. They will, instead, be allowed to rant and rave all they want, however they want, whenever they want.

None of those moderate Christians cares enough to correct any of them … and they will never do so. (No, merely stating disapproval of what these animals said does not, in any way, constitute “correction.” Words are cheap and mean nothing. They’re just a cop-out.) That’s what “the religion of love” stands for. And it’s sickening.

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Rainbow flag breezeThis is the first in a series of posts I plan about the recent Orlando gay-nightclub shooting, by an American Muslim who appears to have been influenced by ISIS and other violent Islamists. By now my readers will surely know a great deal about this horrific event. The topic of this post is:

Why, Of Course It Was About Religion!

Rather soon after the shooting, the shooter’s name was known to the media and they began inquiring about him. His father made an early statement to NBC News, trying to deflect the whole thing (WebCite cached article):

His father told NBC News that his son was affected by a recent incident involving two men showing each other affection.

“We are saying we are apologizing for the whole incident,” the elder Mateen said. “We weren’t aware of any action he is taking. We are in shock like the whole country.”

He added: “This had nothing to do with religion.”

Sorry, pops, but no. That’s not going to fly. Not with me, anyway. Pretty much all hatred of gays, and distaste for homosexuality, follows from religious objections to it. There’s no rational, non-metaphysical reason to be obsessed with homosexuality or to be outraged at gays’ existence. That’s something only religion teaches people.

Reports are trickling in that the shooter may have been bipolar and abusive, according to his ex-wife (cached). Also, co-workers had observed him to be “unhinged and unstable,” among other things (cached). So those who wish to absolve religion for any role in this, would seem to have plenty of ammunition: They can protest that he was mentally ill, sociopathic, etc. Any or all of those, however, can very well co-exist alongside a religious motivation. (I won’t even mention that we don’t, in fact, know with any certainty that the shooter had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder or any other mental illness, to begin with.)

Let’s be honest: If not for widespread, longstanding, pervasive religiously-motivated hatred for gays, why would anyone — even a (possibly) mentally-ill sociopath — have carefully selected a busy gay nightclub as his massacre target? The Abrahamic faiths have had their collective panties in knots over gays and homosexuality for something like 2,500 years, and they’ve infected occidental and Muslim civilizations with their nasty, odious bigotry. How can anyone reasonably insist that this played no role whatever in this savagery?

Oh, and in addition to the aforementioned insistence that his son’s massacre “had nothing to do with religion,” it turns out the shooter’s father actually shared his religiously-inspired hate for gays. CBS News reports on additional comments he posted to Facebook (cached):

The Orland gay club gunman’s father has well-known anti-American views and is an ideological supporter of the Afghan Taliban. A new message posted by the father on Facebook early Monday morning also makes it clear he could have passed anti-homosexual views onto his son.…

The elder Mateen says he was saddened by his son’s actions during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

He then adds: “God will punish those involved in homosexuality,” saying it’s, “not an issue that humans should deal with.”

So it seems the apple didn’t fall far from the tree. Let’s hope everyone keeps an eye on pops, from now on.

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Cry-babyA couple days ago, the Friendly Atheist blogged about a guy who calls himself “the Radical Reverend” going into a Target store, loudly (and annoyingly) preaching that Target’s bathroom policy had provoked “the vengeance of almighty god.” I posted a comment there, which — at the risk of appearing to brag — got a lot of upvotes, explaining why this sort of thing happens. I thought it would be good content for my own blog, since the theme is one I address so many times here, so without further ado:


Re [a quote from the F.A. post]: “The American Family Association, whose anti-Target petition is at nearly 1.2 million signatures, may not advocate these actions but they’re also not doing anything to prevent their followers from ruining the shopping and working experiences of people who have nothing whatsoever to do with the company’s policies.”

Exactly! Why should they do anything about it? This is just the sort of thing they intended to happen when they announced their “boycott.” Like a person who rolls a snowball down a hill, letting it grow as it does and hoping it becomes an avalanche, this is what they wanted to happen.

As for these militant Christianists “ruining the shopping and working experiences of people who have nothing whatsoever to do with the company’s policies,” that means nothing to them. They aren’t capable of thinking rationally enough to realize they’re annoying the crap out of folks who have no power here. It all boils down to just one thing:

They are monumentally angry people. At the same time, they’ve been terminally infantilized by their religionism.

Their sanctimonious outrage, and the anger it’s engendered within them, is something they’re only barely able to control. They’re too juvenile to comprehend that throwing tantrums like this won’t get them anywhere — because, quite honestly, they don’t give a damn. They’re convinced their precious Jesus gave them clear instructions, as well as a mandate to ensure that everyone — not just themselves! — lives by them. They’re enraged that there are people in the world who refuse to abide by those rules and that there are companies like Target that enable them to defy those rules.

So they pitch fits on the sales floor of stores. Because, quite simply, they can’t help it. They’re too immature to understand why it’s wrong. And they can’t be convinced to grow up, because their religion (as they see it) entitles them to remain as infantile as they wish.


Yes, religionism and immaturity are inextricably linked! Whether we’re talking about Muslims rioting over burned Qur’ans, or Religious Rightists in the US saying asinine and/or offensive things, it all boils down to the same core impulse: Childishness which has been reinforced, justified, and perpetuated by religious belief. This is not to say that the way people express this impulse is the same; oh no. It’s not. Barging into a store and screampreaching over bathrooms is not the same as burning and killing over the Qur’an. Those aren’t equivalent behaviors at all! But they do have one thing in common: Sanctimonious immaturity.

As I said in my comment, the only solution is for these people finally to grow up and stop acting like whiney toddlers. But as I also pointed out, so long as they have what they see as a religious entitlement not to have to grow up, they never will. They will, instead, tell themselves, and each other, that they must remain infantilized, because they think their deity has told them they must. Until they do grow up, they’ll remain slaves to their own dour metaphysics.

This is the psycho-social toll religion takes on humanity. The sooner everyone understand this, the sooner we can pry the locks off these fetters and provide people with freedom — real freedom to act like mature adults.

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

My Guitar (lil' Backie)I blogged about the gay oppression “religious freedom” laws recently passed in North Carolina and in Mississippi. Christianists in both states are ecstatic that they now have additional legal weapons to use against a class of person they despise. But there’s been something of a backlash. Businesses, for example, are boycotting both states.

But things ramped up when two famous rockers canceled shows in those states. Bruce Springsteen canceled a concert in Greensboro, NC (WebCite cached article), and Bryan Adams canceled another in Biloxi, MS (cached).

As one would expect, the Religious Right is none too pleased about any of this. They view these counter-measures as a vile attack upon their beliefs and, in turn, their persons. They remain steadfast in their refusal to bend, and they continue to press the lie that these laws promote “safety.” For example, as The Hollywood Reporter explains, an NC Congressman went after Springsteen over his Greensboro cancelation (cached):

A U.S. congressman who represents portions of Greensboro, N.C., is accusing Bruce Springsteen of being a “bully,” after the rock star canceled a concert there to protest a new law that’s being described as anti-gay.

“It’s disappointing he’s not following through on his commitments,” said Rep. Mark Walker, a Republican freshman congressman.…

“Bruce is known to be on the radical left,” continued Walker, “and he’s got every right to be so, but I consider this a bully tactic. It’s like when a kid gets upset and says he’s going to take his ball and go home.”

Walker explains the reasoning behind this law:

“I choose to stand with our sheriffs, who support this bill, which doesn’t target the LGBTQ community; it targets imposters,” said Walker. “It’s a little crazy to think sexual predators wouldn’t be devious enough to pull something off if they were free to go into any bathroom they want.”

There are some problems with this rationalization. First, just because sheriffs support a bill doesn’t automatically make it a good law. Second, there are already laws against “sexual predators” and this one does nothing to stop any of them (since, unless police are posted at restroom doors to prevent entry, it can be enforced only after-the-fact, and by that time a true sexual predator could already have attacked someone). Third, this justification assumes that transgender folks are “sexual predators” in disguise, which isn’t generally true. Yes, I suppose a criminal might pose as transgender, but how often does that really happen? Can Walker or anyone else show it’s common enough to merit such a law? I haven’t seen any statistics along these lines, just a lot of innuendo and slander against gays and transgender folks.

Oh, and it’s nice how Walker dismisses Springsteen as a “radical leftist” and a “bully.” He doesn’t seem to realize his own fellow Religious Rightist movement is, in its own way, also quite “radical” and guilty of a lot of “bullying” of its own. What a fucking hypocrite! I hope he understands his own Jesus explicitly forbid him ever to be hypocritical, at any time or for any reason.

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Indiana State Police Car / Indiana State Police, via Indianapolis StarNote: There’s a little more to say about this story; see below.

As I’ve frequently discussed, the problem with religions is that there’s really nothing supporting anything they teach. Since they all move in the world of metaphysics, it’s generally impossible to confirm them. Believers in a religion, therefore, are usually left foundering in a sea of insecurity. They have few means to relieve this insecurity.

The most common such tactic is communal reinforcement; i.e. they all get together and collectively reassure each other that their religion is true. This might seem like a form of social circular reasoning, and a virtual open-door to delusion, and it is … but it’s a remarkably effective way of relieving the insecurity of adhering to a package of metaphysics.

Even so, it can only provide just so much reassurance. After all, if one looks around and sees the very same people (e.g. the members of one’s own church) all the time, the apparent confirmation they offer each other begins to seem hollow. It’s necessary to expand that pool of mutual-reassurers from time to time; and what’s more, the process of convincing someone to join a religion s/he hadn’t been part of, is another kind of confirmation that can be extremely compelling.

Hence, a lot of religions put a strong emphasis on proselytizing, and some of their followers can essentially become addicted to it. A great example of this is an Indiana state trooper, as WXIN-TV in Indianapolis reports, whose compulsion to proselytize during traffic stops has left him unemployed (WebCite cached article):

Indiana State Police terminated a trooper Thursday after a second complaint in 18 months that he was preaching to citizens after stopping them for traffic violations.

State police say this was in direct violation of an August 2014 counseling statement where Senior Trooper Brian L. Hamilton, 40, was told in writing, “During the course of his official duties, S/Trp. Hamilton will not question others regarding their religious beliefs nor provide religious pamphlets or similar advertisements.”

The most recent traffic stop happened in January of this year, but Hamilton was sued in September of 2014 in a similar case, which was settled.

That’s right, this is Hamilton’s second ride on this particular merry-go-round. He was already caught once doing something he shouldn’t, was documented as having been instructed not to do it again, but then proceeded to do it anyway.

As one would expect in cases like this, Hamilton is defiant and unrepentant:

FOX59 spoke with Hamilton over the phone after news broke of his termination.

“Oh well…I’m just following what the Lord told me to do and you can’t change what the Lord tells you to do. So if the Lord tells me to speak about Jesus Christ, I do. And that’s why they fired me so that’s where we’re at,” he said before disconnecting.

Yes, it’s true, he is doing what his deity instructed in what is known as “the Great Commission”:

Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” (Matthew 28:19-20)

So that provides Hamilton a ready excuse for indulging his compulsion to reassure himself of the veracity of his unfounded religion. It also provides him what he will consider justification for him proselytizing during traffic stops — as a Christian, by this scripture, he’s been explicitly instructed to spread his religion. He and his lawyers will, I’m sure, sue the state of Indiana on the grounds that his “religious freedom” was infringed, and the Great Commission, I’m equally sure, will be their Exhibit 1 in that case.

The problems with what Hamilton did are myriad, though, and are quite obvious. Quite aside from simply offending people who don’t want to be pelted with his Christianity during a traffic stop, it places those he stops in untenable positions, and can create conflicts of interest. First, someone who has no intention of doing so may promise Hamilton that s/he will go to his church, just to get out of a ticket; but what happens a few weeks later when s/he hasn’t shown up? Hamilton has that driver’s information, and could track him/her down later. I dare not think how that might work out! Second, what happens if the driver responds some other way, such as saying s/he won’t go to his church (whether because s/he isn’t religious, or is already committed to some other faith)? That driver risks offending Hamilton so that, perhaps, he might treat him/her more harshly. Moreover, what would Hamilton have done if he’d stopped someone who attended his own church? Might he have let that driver go without taking any action?

Put simply, Hamilton’s proselytizing compromises his job and, in turn, how the Indiana State Police relate to the public. It’s just not something they can tolerate.

In addition to suing Indiana over his firing, I also predict Hamilton will also go on the Christian lecture circuit, whining to rapt church audiences how he was fired for Jesus and simply because he “offended” people. His Christianist audiences will, no doubt, sympathize, and wonder what the problem is; why shouldn’t drivers want to hear Jesus’ gospel during traffic stops? After all, Hamilton is just looking out for their mortal souls and providing them what they need. How dare he be fired for having “offended” people?

I won’t even address the (poor) ethics of proselytizing to a captive audience … which is what a driver whom Hamilton has stopped, is. Christianists generally dismiss this particular issue; they happily proselytize in all sorts of closed settings, such as in prisons, schools, etc. It never occurs to them that it’s an underhanded tactic.

These Christianists won’t understand — or worse, will simply refuse even to begin to comprehend — what I explained above, which is that “offending” stopped drivers is the least of the problems which result from what Hamilton did. All they care about is their precious Jesus and making sure everyone else worships him as they do. Because really, what this boils down to is, Christianists are both selfish (seeing things only in their own way and never through anyone else’s perspective) and infantile (always demanding they run things whereas no one else is permitted to have any say in anything, ever).

P.S. I love how proselytizers like Hamilton always assume people have never heard of their Jesus … as though someone could have lived in the US for at least 16 years (thus being eligible to drive) yet never have heard of him. No American of driving age can possibly fail to know about Jesus, period. So why do Hamilton and his ilk think they have? I’ve never understood this assumption.

Update: Former trooper Hamilton truly is the unrepentant militant Christianist I’d assumed he is, as this story by WRTV-TV in Indianapolis reveals (cached). He’s a “soldier for Jesus” who’s simply following the commands of his Almighty. The poor little thing just can’t help but shove his Jesus down the throats of drivers he stops. Also, as I’d assumed, he clearly has a cadre of supporters who are just as unrepentantly militant as he is. I expect an uproar over his firing.

Photo credit: Indiana State Police, via Indianapolis Star.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Noah's Ark toys / ariesa66, via PixabayFor ages, Christianists committed to a literal reading of the Genesis creation legend have worked diligently to force others to believe in it the way they do. It’s never enough for them that they believe in it; they require everyone else’s agreement, too. Anything less is directly harmful to them … somehow. I have no idea how, but they’re convinced of it, and they act accordingly.

Toward that end they’ve been trying to ram their Creationism down school kids’ throats, for decades. That teaching religion in public school is unconstitutional hasn’t really been enough to stop them. Many Christianists go so far as to deny the unconstitutionality of it, even if they’d scream and holler like banshees if a public-school teacher taught — say — the Slavic creation myth rather than the Genesis Creation story. Even so, courts haven’t seen things this way, so Creationists have had to devise other tactics to get their religion into schools … such as by calling it “Creation Science” (which it’s not, because there’s no “science” in it), or “intelligent design,” which also doesn’t work.

Courts have generally seen through these charades, too. But that hasn’t stopped Christianists from keeping up the effort to force their beliefs on school children. Oh no. They just keep at it, relentlessly. As the New Orleans Times-Picayune reports, a Democratic state senator in Louisiana recently took up this cause (WebCite cached article):

State Sen. John Milkovich, D-Shreveport, made the case for teaching creationism in schools Tuesday night (March 29).

“Scientific research and developments and advances in the last 100 years — particularly the last 15, 20, 10 years — have validated the biblical story of creation,” the freshman state senator said.

Milkovich, who is the vice chairman of the Senate Education Committee, said archeologists and scientists have verified the origin story of the Christian Bible. He said archeologists had found the remnants of Noah’s ark recently. A study of rocks had verified that the earth was created in a week, Milkovich said.

This is a bold-faced, brazen, out-&-out lie. Science has not, in fact, “validated the biblical story of creation.” Not at all, and not even in the slightest way. Noah’s Ark has not been found. The recent “discovery” Milkovich mentions is — as it turns out — a big fucking hoax promoted by a pro-Flood crank (cached). And that’s not the only Noah’s Ark discovery hoax that’s been perpetrated over the last few decades (cached).

Lies, lies, lies, lies, lies! All lies!

I have to add Milkovich to my “lying liars for Jesus” club. He’ll be in good company there, even if most of his fellow politicians in that assembly are Republicans rather than Democrats like himself.

I’m continually amazed at the shamelessness of militant Christianists like Milkovich. They lie, and lie some more, and lie even more, on and on and on, and they do so openly and with the approval of a large segment of the public. They literally cannot be shamed into stopping, because they have none. They’re doing “the Lord’s work,” you see, so that makes their lies OK. Or something. I guess. I mean, they must think their Jesus wants them to lie for him. No?

Photo credit: ariesa66, via Pixabay.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

Aftermath of Brussels airport bombing / (UK) IndependentThis morning, we Americans woke to some terrible — but not entirely surprising — news. The “religion of peace” has struck again. As numerous outlets, including CNN, report just now, three blasts rocked the city of Brussels, Belgium (WebCite cached article):

Three explosions that ripped through the Belgian capital of Brussels on Tuesday killed at least 28 people, according to Belgian media, and raised the reality of terror once again in the heart of Europe.

“We were fearing terrorist attacks, and that has now happened,” Belgian Prime Minister Charles Michel told reporters.

Belgian federal Prosecutor Frederic Van Leeuw said it was too soon to know exactly how many people died in the bombings. Yet the Brussels Metro Authority reported that 15 died and 55 were wounded in the subway station blast. And public broadcaster VRT said at least 13 more were killed, and about 35 were injured, in the two blasts in the Brussels airport departure hall.

Of the two explosions at the airport, at least one was a suicide bombing, Van Leeuw said. A blast happened there outside the security checkpoints for ticketed passengers and near the airline check-in counters, an airline official briefed on the situation said.

It’s not yet clear which exact Islamist-terror organization was behind these attacks; there’ve been no claims of responsibility and officials are only just gathering information.[Update 1] At this point there doesn’t appear to be much to say that hasn’t already been said many times already. So I will close with what I said after the Paris attacks last November:

Clearly, the “Religion of Peace” has shown its true colors … again! … even if, by now, no sane person actually needs such an illustration. Predictably, Muslim leaders and organizations around the world have condemned the attacks on Paris, but let’s be honest: Those condemnations will accomplish nothing whatsoever. ISIS/ISIL/IS/whatever-the-fuck and all its ilk will continue their barbaric terror campaigns, and they’ll keep attracting Muslim recruits from around the world. It’s not going to stop just because some scholars of Islam mouth recriminations against Islamist terror. The Islamists already don’t give a flying fuck what anyone else thinks, and they’re not going to, ever. Mere words don’t matter, and have no discernible effect on them.

The sooner the world’s Muslims begin actively (rather than just verbally) dealing with the festering sore deep within their religion, which these violent barbarians believe grants divine sanction to their savage terror campaign, the sooner something can actually be done about it. But sadly, I just don’t see that happening. Not enough of them have the courage to do so.

Nothing will change, I’m sure … just as nothing was done in the wake of the Paris and San Bernardino attacks. It never does. I’m reminded of this classic Bible verse:

That which has been is that which will be,
And that which has been done is that which will be done.
So there is nothing new under the sun. (Ecclesiastes 1:9)

P.S. Christianists had best not use this to get on their high horses and start bellowing out their usual sanctimonious Neocrusading crap. Right-wing (and yes, Christian!) terror exists, and is a greater danger to Americans than Islamists’.

Update 1: Reuters reports that ISIS/ISIL/IS/whatever has, in fact, claimed responsibility for the Brussels attacks (cached).

Photo credit: (UK) Independent.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »