Posts Tagged “anti-vaxer”

Angel-Facepalm: Even imaginary beings know how dumb that was!The idea that vaccines are toxic — particularly those given routinely to children, such as the MMR vaccine, which supposedly causes autism — is a big, fat, fucking lie that just won’t die, even though it’s been proven fraudulent. Yes, that’s right. It’s a massive con job, originally cooked up by a British “physician” who’d hoped to make his fortune selling autism remedies.

That’s right, folks. The movement that rails and blusters and fumes against “Big Pharma” and its supposedly malevolent profit motive, was founded on the work of a man who’d planned to profit from a lie he’d carefully constructed (WebCite cached article). I can smell the stench of the contradiction and hypocrisy from here … !

As I said, the antivax movement just won’t go away. This is very likely a product of the backfire effect, but it’s been further fueled by charlatans and cranks who milk it for their own aggrandizement … such as the Groper-in-Chief, who declared his antivax credentials during the 2016 presidential primary. As he prepares to enter the Oval Office, as the Washington Post reports, the Apricot Wonder has decided another antivaxxer should be put in charge of vaccine safety (cached):

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a proponent of a widely discredited theory that vaccines cause autism, said Tuesday that President-elect Donald Trump asked him to chair a new commission on vaccines.

Hours later, however, a spokeswoman for Trump’s transition said that while Trump would like to create a commission on autism, no final decision had been made.

If Trump follows through, the stunning move would push up against established science, medicine and the government’s position on the issue. It comes after Trump — who has long been critical of vaccines — met at Trump Tower with Kennedy, who has spearheaded efforts to roll back child vaccination laws.

This is, of course, all about the children, you see:

“The President-elect enjoyed his discussion with Robert Kennedy Jr. on a range of issues and appreciates his thoughts and ideas,” Trump transition spokeswoman Hope Hicks said in a statement. “The President-elect is exploring the possibility of forming a commission on autism, which affects so many families; however no decisions have been made at this time.

“The President-elect looks forward to continuing the discussion about all aspects of autism with many groups and individuals,” she added.

You can be sure the Groper-in-Chief doesn’t give a flying fuck about autism or the welfare of children. If he did, he’d pursue another angle than “vaccine safety” to address it … because vaccines don’t have one damned, fucking thing to do with autism. Period. End of story.

I’ve blogged already about Kennedy’s antivaxxism. As the WaPo article makes clear, he hasn’t let go of it, despite his movement having been thoroughly debunked many times over. Then again, we have entered the post-truth era, and pesky little things like “fact” and “confirmed science” no longer matter any more. The Groper-in-Chief’s ignorant flyover-country voters have seen to that. If you needed any more proof that this country is fucked, well, now you have it.

Photo credit: shane_d_k, via Flickr.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on Antivaxxer Being Given Control of Vaccine Safety

Flu Vaccination GrippeNearly a year ago, the British medical journal Lancet retracted an article it published, back in 1998, which linked autism with the MMR vaccine. The Wakefield study was known to have been flawed before then; the Lancet retraction was merely one more nail in its coffin. (The most recent nail — and perhaps its final one — was a more recent finding that the study was fully fraudulent and not merely “flawed.”)

Something similar has been happening at a different media outlet, the online magazine Salon. Back in 2005 it (and its then-partner, Rolling Stone magazine) had presented an article by Robert F. Kennedy Jr claiming that vaccines were dangerous and that an entrenched corporate/government conspiracy had been working to prevent people from knowing about it.

I’ve already blogged about RFK Jr’s wingnutism. And Salon, to its credit, almost immediately began backtracking from the story, releasing a long series of corrections and emendations, hoping to reel it back in.

But the antivax nutters refused to let up, and continued to milk the original paranoid RFK Jr article as “proof” that vaccines caused autism and that a conspiracy was afoot to hide this.

Well, Salon finally followed Lancet‘s lead, and formally retracted that story. Salon Editor in Chief Kerry Lauerman explains this decision (WebCite cached article):

In 2005, Salon published online an exclusive story by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that offered an explosive premise: that the mercury-based thimerosal compound present in vaccines until 2001 was dangerous, and that he was “convinced that the link between thimerosal and the epidemic of childhood neurological disorders is real.” …

At the time, we felt that correcting the piece — and keeping it on the site, in the spirit of transparency — was the best way to operate. But subsequent critics, including most recently, Seth Mnookin in his book “The Panic Virus,” [cached] further eroded any faith we had in the story’s value. We’ve grown to believe the best reader service is to delete the piece entirely.

If you really want to read RFK Jr’s drivel, it’s still available as a WebCite cached article, and it’s also still hosted at RFK Jr’s own Web site (cached).

I have no doubt that “true believers” in the antivax movement will not be fazed by any of these retractions. If anything, they will further convince them that the conspiracy they’re so convinced is in play, has been at work, and forced the retractions. In other words, these retractions will actually confirm, rather than undermine, their nutty beliefs. (The mechanism by which this sort of thing is one I’ve blogged about before.)

P.S. It’s not clear what Rolling Stone has done with this story. I cannot find it on their site. It’s as though it never had existed. Hmm.

Hat tip: Boing Boing & Retraction Watch.

Photo credit: Daniel Paquet.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 4 Comments »

flu shot!I blogged just under a year ago that the prestigious Lancet retracted a study it had published in 1998, by Dr Andrew Wakefield, which laid the foundations for the anti-vaccine movement. CNN reports, though, that a BMJ investigation into that study has revealed it’s worse than being just bad science — it was an outright fraud (WebCite cached article):

A now-retracted British study that linked autism to childhood vaccines was an “elaborate fraud” that has done long-lasting damage to public health, a leading medical publication reported Wednesday.

An investigation published by the British medical journal BMJ concludes the study’s author, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, misrepresented or altered the medical histories of all 12 of the patients whose cases formed the basis of the 1998 study — and that there was “no doubt” Wakefield was responsible.

The study’s investigators pulled no punches:

“It’s one thing to have a bad study, a study full of error, and for the authors then to admit that they made errors,” Fiona Godlee, BMJ’s editor-in-chief, told CNN. “But in this case, we have a very different picture of what seems to be a deliberate attempt to create an impression that there was a link by falsifying the data.”

Wakefield, of course, isn’t having any of it, and is playing the martyr:

Speaking to CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360,” Wakefield said his work has been “grossly distorted” and that he was the target of “a ruthless, pragmatic attempt to crush any attempt to investigate valid vaccine safety concerns.”

My guess is that all the famous committed antivaxers — such as Jenny McCarthy, Bill Maher, Suzanne Somers, etc. — will side with Wakefield and his persecution complex. The evidence of Wakefield’s fraud that BMJ turned up, will mean nothing to any of them.

Photo credit: samantha celera, via Flickr.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments 3 Comments »