Posts Tagged “anti-witchcraft”

Women condemned for witchcraft burned at the stake / Rudolf Cronau [Public domain], via Wikimedia CommonsOne of the (many) surprising things I learned about the Middle Ages, while I studied that period in college, was that for much of the period — despite common folk belief that witches were real and a threat to society — witch-hunts generally did not occur. The Church actually taught that witches did not exist — despite widespread folk belief they did, in many areas — and that to suggest they did, was heresy.

That’s not to say the Church was a collection of pansies; they certainly did go after heretics of various kinds, e.g. the Cathars, against whom they marched to war in the early 13th century, and the repression of the Knights Templars was predicated on charges of heresy and blasphemy, not of witchcraft (as is sometimes said).

But through the 15th century this attitude changed, and witch-hunts began to occur. From the middle of the 16th century through the middle of the 17th, witch-hunts reached their peak. By the close of the 17th century, witch-hunting mania had all but died out, both in Europe and in the New World (the infamous Salem Witch Trials took place in the early 1690s).

I’d always suspected this had been brought on by religious reform fervor which had been underway for some time already (e.g. in the case of Waldenses, Cathars, Lollards, Hussites, etc.). Especially in the wake of the Great Western Schism ending in 1417, religion was being rethought in many quarters. In a world of religious speculation, fear of the preternatural rose, leading to witchcraft panics, but purging towns of witches didn’t offer any positive results, so these panics literally burned out. But that’s as far as my speculation went.

Recently two economists (of all people) have examined this mystery, and arrived at a possible explanation. The (UK) Guardian reports on their interesting findings (Archive.Is cached article):

But by 1550 Christian authorities had reversed their position [that witches didn’t exist], leading to a witch-hunt across Christendom. Many explanations have been advanced for what drove the phenomenon. Now new research suggests there is an economic explanation, one that has relevance to the modern day.

Economists Peter Leeson and Jacob Russ of George Mason University in Virginia argue that the trials reflected “non-price competition between the Catholic and Protestant churches for religious market share” [cached].

As competing Catholic and Protestant churches vied to win over or retain their followers, they needed to make an impact — and witch trials were the battleground they chose. Or, as the two academics put it in their paper, to be published in the new edition of the Economic Journal: “Leveraging popular belief in witchcraft, witch-prosecutors advertised their confessional brands’ commitment and power to protect citizens from worldly manifestations of Satan’s evil.”

They reach their conclusion after drawing on analyses of new data covering more than 43,000 people tried for witchcraft in 21 European countries.

It was about both sides each trying to one-up each other and prove their piety and sacred prowess. It’s an interesting idea, and makes a good deal of sense in the context of the time. Although the Guardian compares this to Stalin’s “show trials” of the mid-1930s, I see parallels elsewhere, such as with Islamist groups going after third-party (mostly occidental) victims in their efforts to impress the rest of the Islam world with their sanctity and to prove they have al-Lah’s favor.

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons.

Hat tip: Secular Web News Wire.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments No Comments »

In the “Are you kidding me?” department … the BBC reports that famous Scottish author J.K. Rowling was refused an important honor because the White House thought she “encouraged witchcraft”:

Harry Potter author JK Rowling missed out on a top honour because some US politicians believed she “encouraged witchcraft”, it has been claimed.

Matt Latimer, former speech writer for President George W Bush, said that some members of his administration believed her books promoted sorcery.

As a result, she was never presented with the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Latimer’s disclosure comes from an upcoming tell-all book:

The claims appear in Latimer’s new book called Speechless: Tales of a White House Survivor.

He wrote that “narrow thinking” led White House officials to object to giving Rowling the civilian honour.

The award acknowledges contributions to US national interest, world peace or cultural endeavours.

First, let me say that these “tell-all” books by folks who are, essentially, disgruntled employees, are not very trustworthy. So I’m not sure how credible this is. And even if there were someone in the White House who made remarks like this, it’s not clear who it was, or how much influence that person had. It’s not even clear if some other objection to Rowling getting the medal was raised, such as her not being a US citizen. (The Medal has been given to some not born in the States, e.g. Elie Wiesel, but not being an American may have represented a hurdle anway. To what extent, I have no idea.)

Nonetheless, it’s remarkable that in the 21st century, people can still fear books that mention “witchcraft” and/or “sorcery” merely because they contain these story elements. After all, famous Christian writers have used magical or sorcerous settings for their own widely-beloved works … sticking to the UK, the examples of J.R.R. Tolkien (a lifelong devout Catholic) and C.S. Lewis (an adult convert to the Anglican Church) leap to mind. The religious devotion of neither of these men has ever been seriously questioned, nor has it ever been suggested that either of them ever “promoted” or “encouraged” witchcraft or sorcery, even though they both wrote about worlds (Middle-Earth and Narnia respectively) in which these things existed, and protagonists (e.g. Gandalf and Aslan) who made use of them. Objecting to Rowling’s Harry Potter series on that basis — which are almost as much moral tales as either The Lord of the Rings or The Chronicles of Narnia — is simply irrational and unfounded.

While we cannot just take Latimer’s word that Christian-dogmatic anti-witchcraft sentiment played a part in this decision, it is unfortunately true that the Harry Potter books were the targets of fundamentalist Christian outrage. It’s nonsensical, of course … but these folks are fully committed to their nonsensical ideas and are unable — and unwilling — to see them as the nonsense they are.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments Comments Off on Turned Down For Medal — Over Witchcraft?